Current Slide
Small screen detected. You are viewing the mobile version of SlideWiki. If you wish to edit slides you will need to use a larger device.
Relationship to WSMO
- Underlying specification
- OWL-S is specified using OWL, and WSMO uses abstract MOF model.
- Language unification
- OWL-S needs to combine OWL with more expressive languages (e.g. for expressing conditions and workflow constructs) while WSMO provides a single unified language framework.
- Conceptual model similarities
- OWL-S Service Profile is close to the capability of a service/goal in WSMO.
- WSMO distinguishes requester’s and provider’s view
- OWL-S Process Model is conceptually similar to the WSMO service/goal interfaces.
- WSMO distinguishes between the external and internal behavior
- OWL-S Service Profile is close to the capability of a service/goal in WSMO.
- OWL-S lacks mediation facilities
- Grounding similarities
- Both approaches adopt similar ideas with respect to binding to WSDL.
- It is a top level concept in OWL-S and not in WSMO
- Both approaches adopt similar ideas with respect to binding to WSDL.
Speaker notes:
Content Tools
Tools
Sources (0)
Tags (0)
Comments (0)
History
Usage
Questions (0)
Playlists (0)
Quality
Sources
There are currently no sources for this slide.