CS276
Information Retrieval and Web Search
Pandu Nayak and Prabhakar Raghavan
Lecture 1: Boolean retrieval
Information Retrieval (IR) is finding material (usually documents) of an unstructured nature (usually text) that satisfies an information need from within large collections (usually stored on computers)
Brutus AND Caesar BUT NOT 1 if play contains word,
Calpurnia 0 otherwise
So we have a 0/1 vector for each term.
To answer query: take the vectors for Brutus, Caesar and Calpurnia (complemented) → bitwise AND.
110100 AND 110111 AND 101111 = 100100.
So we have a 0/1 vector for each term.
To answer query: take the vectors for Brutus, Caesar and Calpurnia (complemented) → bitwise AND.
110100 AND 110111 AND 101111 = 100100.
Goal: Retrieve documents with information that is relevant to the user’s information need and helps the user complete a task.
Precision : Fraction of retrieved docs that are relevant to user’s information need
Recall : Fraction of relevant docs in collection that are retrieved
More precise definitions and measurements to follow in later lectures
Consider N = 1 million documents, each with about 1000 words.
Avg 6 bytes/word including spaces/punctuation
6GB of data in the documents.
Say there are M = 500K distinct terms among these.
Brutus | → | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 31 | 45 | 173 | 174 | |
Caesar | → | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 57 | 32 | |
Calpurnia | → | 2 | 31 | 54 | 101 |
|
What happens if the word Caesar is added to document 14?
We need variable-size postings lists
On disk, a continuous run of postings is normal and best
In memory, can use linked lists or variable length arrays
Some tradeoffs in size/ease of insertion Posting(below)
Brutus | → | 1 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 31 | 45 | 173 | 174 | |
Caesar | → | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 57 | 32 | |
Calpurnia | → | 2 | 31 | 54 | 101 |
|
Brutus , Caeser and Calpurnia are dictionaries.
Numbers are postings.
Sorted by docID (more later on why).
How do we process a query?
Later - what kinds of queries can we process? ← Today’s focus
Consider processing the query: Brutus AND Caesar
Locate Brutus in the Dictionary;
Retrieve its postings.
Locate Caesar in the Dictionary;
Retrieve its postings.
Merge” the two postings:
What is the best order for query processing?
Consider a query that is an AND of n terms.
For each of the n terms, get its postings, then AND them together.
Brutus | → | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 | ||
Caesar | → | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 34 | |
Calpurnia | → | 13 | 16 |
|
Process in order of increasing freq:
start with smallest set, then keep cutting further.
↑
(This is why we kept document freq. in dictionary)
Brutus | → | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | 64 | 128 | ||
Caesar | → | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 16 | 21 | 34 | |
Calpurnia | → | 13 | 16 |
|
Execute the query as (Calpurnia AND Brutus) AND Caesar.
Boolean Queries use AND, OR and NOT to join query terms
Views each document as a set of words
Is precise: document matches condition or not.
Perhaps the simplest model to build an IR system on
Primary commercial retrieval tool for 3 decades.
Many search systems you still use are Boolean:
Email, library catalog, Mac OS X Spotlight
Exercise: Adapt the merge for the queries:
Brutus AND NOT Caesar
Brutus OR NOT Caesar
Can we still run through the merge in time O(x+y)?
What can we achieve?
Exercise: Adapt the merge for the queries:
Brutus AND NOT Caesar
Brutus OR NOT Caesar
Can we still run through the merge in time O(x+y)?
What can we achieve?
Largest commercial (paying subscribers) legal search service (started 1975; ranking added 1992)
Tens of terabytes of data; 700,000 users
Majority of users still use boolean queries
Example query:
What is the statute of limitations in cases involving the federal tort claims act?
LIMIT! /3 STATUTE ACTION /S FEDERAL /2 TORT /3 CLAIM
/3 = within 3 words, /S = in same sentence
Another example query:
Requirements for disabled people to be able to access a workplace
disabl! /p access! /s work-site work-place (employment /3 place)
Note that SPACE is disjunction, not conjunction!
Long, precise queries; proximity operators; incrementally developed; not like web search
Many professional searchers still like Boolean search
You know exactly what you are getting
But that doesn’t mean it actually works better….
e.g., (madding OR crowd) AND (ignoble OR strife)
Get doc. freq.’s for all terms.
Estimate the size of each OR by the sum of its doc. freq.’s (conservative).
Process in increasing order of OR sizes.
(tangerine OR trees) AND
(marmalade OR skies) AND
(kaleidoscope OR eyes)
Term Freq
eyes 213312
kaleidoscope 87009
marmalade 107913
skies 271658
tangerine 46653
trees 316812
Exercise: If the query is friends AND romans AND (NOT countrymen), how could we use the freq of countrymen?
Exercise: Extend the merge to an arbitrary Boolean query. Can we always guarantee execution in time linear in the total postings size?
Hint: Begin with the case of a Boolean formula query where each term appears only once in the query.
Try the search feature at
Write down five search features you think it could do better
Beyond term search
What about phrases?
Stanford University
Proximity: Find Gates NEAR Microsoft.
Need index to capture position information in docs.
Zones in documents: Find documents with
(author = Ullman) AND (text contains automata).
1 vs. 0 occurrence of a search term
2 vs. 1 occurrence
3 vs. 2 occurrences, etc.
Usually more seems better
Need term frequency information in docs
Boolean queries give inclusion or exclusion of docs.
Often we want to rank/group results
Need to measure proximity from query to each doc.
Need to decide whether docs presented to user are singletons, or a group of docs covering various aspects of the query.
Structured data tends to refer to information in “tables”
Employee | Manager | Salary | ||||||||
Smith | Jones | 50000 | ||||||||
Chang | Smith | 60000 | ||||||||
Ivy | Smith | 50000 | ||||||||
Typically allows numerical range and exact match
(for text) queries, e.g.,
Salary < 60000 AND Manager = Smith.
Typically refers to free-form text
Allows
Keyword queries including operators
More sophisticated “concept” queries, e.g.,
find all web pages dealing with drug abuse
Classic model for searching text documents
In fact almost no data is “unstructured”
E.g., this slide has distinctly identified zones such as the Title and Bullets
Facilitates “semi-structured” search such as
Title contains data AND Bullets contain search
… to say nothing of linguistic structure
Title is about Object Oriented Programming AND Author something like stro*rup
where * is the wild-card operator
Issues:
how do you process “about”?
how do you rank results?
The focus of XML search (IIR chapter 10)
Clustering: Given a set of docs, group them into clusters based on their contents.
Classification: Given a set of topics, plus a new doc D, decide which topic(s) D belongs to.
Ranking: Can we learn how to best order a set of documents, e.g., a set of search results
Unusual and diverse documents
Unusual and diverse users, queries, information needs
Beyond terms, exploit ideas from social networks
link analysis, clickstreams ...
How do search engines work?
And how can we make them better?
Cross-language information retrieval
Question answering
Summarization
Text mining
…
Introduction to Information Retrieval, chapter 1
Shakespeare:
Try the neat browse by keyword sequence feature!
Managing Gigabytes, chapter 3.2
Modern Information Retrieval, chapter 8.2